Table of Contents

1. Trends
2. Cost Savings Potential
3. Best Practices/Case Studies
4. How-To Tips
5. Contact Information
6. Research/Articles
7. Legislation
8. Links

1. Trends


A 1995 study of 120 local governments in 34 states found that between 1987 and 1995, the percentage of cities contracting out for tree trimming services increased by about 15 percent, with a total of 32 percent of cities contracting out for this service.

Currently, Costa Mesa, Brea, Newport Beach, Orange, Tustin, Fullerton and dozens of other California cities contract out for tree-trimming service.

Return to Top


2. Cost Savings Potential


Cost savings from outsourcing tree trimming and landscaping services typically ranges from 16 percent to 35 percent.

In the past decade, private tree trimming has become far more competitive, forcing contractors to reduce prices. It now is possible to contract routine tree trimming services at a price well below in-house rates.

Return to Top


3. Best Practices/Case Studies


Case Study 1: Newport Beach, CA — Competitive Contracting


The urban forests in Newport Beach are visible attractions to its citizens. In fact, the city has a Citizen’s Street Tree Committee, which advises its city council on tree-related issues, such as when the city’s in-house resources lagged behind the efforts necessary to maintain its urban forest.

In August 1993, the City of Newport Beach hired Integrated Urban Forestry, Inc., (IUF), a private consultant, to do a comprehensive study of its tree maintenance program, and found that Newport’s trim cost per tree in the 1993-94 fiscal year was $81.

After studying the market rates for trim cost per tree and private services, IUF recommended that Newport Beach competitively contract its tree maintenance services. The IUF report found that a private contractor would save approximately $211,000 per year on its tree-trimming service, while providing more efficient and productive services.

IUF found that city crews were compensated at a higher rate than private crews — in salaries, benefits and also in pay for non-productive time. IUF also found that city crews were on the whole less productive than private crews because city crews worked fewer hours and spent less time at the job site. Additionally, average daily productivity for city crews was 6.9 hours, while the average daily productivity for private crews was 9 hours. Since Newport Beach lacked an organized trim plan, crews were not being used to their maximum potential.

In November 1993, a private contractor took over tree-trimming services in Newport Beach. At IUF’s recommendation, the city retained a small crew to handle emergencies and special requests. The private firm West Coast Arborists agreed to hire the displaced city workers at their existing rates for one year. Newport Beach saved $241,000 in the 1995-96 fiscal year on its tree trimming services, and estimates an accumulated savings of $609,000 by June 1997.




Case Study 2: Orange, CA — Competitive Contracting


In 1993, the City of Orange contracted with West Coast Arborists for tree-trimming services. One tree supervisor was retained as a liaison between the city agency and the contractor, and public works employees now respond to emergencies.

Despite the city reducing its tree-trimming budget the following year, West Coast was able to maintain its profit margin and did not raise its unit cost. Pat Pine, field supervisor for the Orange Public Works Department, rated the West Coast crews well above city crews in terms of service, productivity, and management.




Case Study 3: Indianapolis, IN — Competitive Contracting


Indianapolis competitively contracts for mowing in more than 45 neighborhood parks. Since contracting began, mowing complaints have fallen by 95 percent. Parks department employees now concentrate on the large regional parks.

Indianapolis initially was contracting to have grass cut every six weeks. But seasonal weather variations make such a criterion meaningless — grass grows much faster during the spring. Furthermore, checking up on contractors is tedious — you have to track them down to make sure they’re really mowing when they claim they are.

Then the city grew more sophisticated. After all, it didn’t really want the grass cut every six weeks — they wanted their grass to be kept short. Now, the city contracts with a company to keep the grass less than 4 inches high and pays by the acre. Monitoring is easier, too. At random times, someone simply goes out with a ruler.



Return to Top


4. How-to-Tips


Return to Top


5. Contact Information


Practitioners
David E. Niederhaus
Director, General Services Department
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92659-8915
(714) 644-3055


Robert W. Hawkinson
Special Projects Coordinator
City of Indianapolis, Enterprise Development
Suite 2460
City-County Building
200 E. Washington Street
Indianapolis, IN 46204-3332
(317) 327-7854

Return to Top


6. Research/Articles


This section is still under construction. Please check back soon.

Return to Top


7. Legislation


This section is still under construction. Please check back soon.

Return to Top


8. Links


This section is still under construction. Please check back soon.

Return to Top