Table of Contents
|
1. Trends 2. Cost Savings Potential 3. Best Practices/Case Studies 4. How-To Tips |
5. Contact Information 6. Research/Articles 7. Legislation 8. Links |
1. Trends
A 1995 study of 120 local governments in 34 states found that between 1987 and 1995, the percentage of cities contracting out for road maintenance increased by 19 percent, bringing the total percentage of cities outsourcing for road maintenance services to 37 percent.
2. Cost Savings Potential
Cost savings from outsourcing road maintenance services typically range from 25 to 50 percent. A 1984 study showed that contracting out for highway maintenance cost half as much as delivering these services in-house.
3. Best Practices/Case Studies
| Case Study 1: Laguna Niguel, CA — Competitive Contracting |
|
Laguna Niguel now has a regular patrol of its rights of way, and the citizens are enjoying cleaner streets. The response time in resolving customer complaints was reduced from 56 days to 6.5 days over a six-month period. In addition, the average number of complaints has dropped 44 percent. The response time for emergencies also had to be considered when the city privatized. Officials wrote into the agreement with the contractor that "all of the subcontractors that our maintenance contractor hired had to be available to respond to call-outs (emergencies), and this has worked out extremely well," said Montgomery. Officials in Laguna Niguel found the transition to privatization particularly easy because they didn’t have to be concerned with layoffs or relocating workers. All of the public employees that provided their street maintenance had worked for the county. |
| Case Study 2: Indianapolis, IN — Public-Private Competition |
|
The first service opened to competition was pothole filling. Forced to compete, city workers streamlined operations, dropping from eight workers on a crew to four, and going from two trucks to just one, but still their costs weren’t competitive with private firms. In reviewing their costs, city employees discovered that the overhead costs of indirect management were enormous. There were 92 truck drivers and 32 management supervisors. "We can’t compete if you are going to attribute their salaries into our costs of doing business," the union told the mayor. The front-line union employees asked Mayor Goldsmith to unload them of the burden of the supervisors. In response, Mayor Goldsmith laid off most of the supervisors. The city unit won the contract. With the assistance of outside experts, they now do intensive full-cost accounting on all the services they perform, from chuck-hole filling to crack-sealing to line painting. They can tell you exactly how much money it costs for every mile of cracks in the road they seal or every street sign they make. They also have gone through something called the GE Dot Matrix. This means that city crews have evaluated their strengths and weaknesses compared to other competitors in the marketplace. In the private sector, this sort of benchmarking process is fairly common; it’s unheard of in government. City crews use this information when they bid on contracts. If they have determined a service is not one of their strengths, they won’t bid on it. |
| Case Study 3: British Columbia, Canada — Employee Buyout |
|
The majority of workers affected by the privatization, about 3,800 employees, had performed all provincial bridge and road maintenance. These workers originally were allocated among the province’s eight development regions. From the beginning, the government sought to protect the interests of these current employees, encouraging proposals that involved continued employment of existing workers. The government also encouraged existing employees to form their own private firms to take over the services they were providing. The government gave qualifying employee groups the first opportunity to bid on providing services as prime contractors for their contract area. Moreover, bids from these employee-owned firms were given a 5 percent preference over non-employee bids. Ultimately, of the 28 multi-year contracts, 10 were awarded to new firms composed of the former provincial employees. |
4. How-to-Tips
5. Contact Information
| Practitioners | Michael Stayton Director Public Works Department 2460 City-County Building 200 E. Washington Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 (317) 327-4795 |
Ken Montgomery Director Public Works Department 27791 La Paz Road Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 (714) 362-4339 |
|
George Wentz Vice-President Charles Abbott Associates 6866 Verde Ridge Road Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 (310) 541-0671 |