Table of Contents
|
1. Trends 2. Cost Savings Potential 3. Best Practices/Case Studies 4. How-To Tips |
5. Contact Information 6. Research/Articles 7. Legislation 8. Links |
1. Trends
Between 1987 and 1995, the percentage of cities contracting out for golf course
services increased by almost 10 percent, bringing the total percentage of cities
contracting for golf course operations to 25 percent (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. Privatization of Municipal Golf Courses (Percent of Cities)

Source: Contracting Public Services Survey: 1995 Update. Mercer Group, Atlanta, GA.
Most privately run golf courses are managed by small businesses and entrepreneurs. Of the estimated more than 15,000 golf facilities now in the United States, only 834 (about 5.5 percent) are managed by multi-course private management firms, according to a study recently.
Figure 2. U.S. Golf Ownership and Access

Source: National Golf Foundation.
2. Cost Savings Potential
Most municipalities privatize golf operations to increase revenues and to provide needed capital improvements. Table 1 provides a comparison of the revenues received by California cities following the privatization of golf courses.
| Table 1. Municipal Revenue
Comparison |
|||||
| Descriptive Information | Revenue | ||||
| Course Name | City | Last Year Public | Public Operation | Private Operation (first year) | 1995-96 Fiscal Year |
| El Dorado | Long Beach | FY/83 | (68,918) | 201,087 | 609,714 |
| La Mirada Golf Course | Los Angeles | FY/81 | 155,547 | 182,558 | 1,006,537 |
| Los Verdes | Los Angeles | FY/81 | 94,553 | 56,412 | 1,187,307 |
| Mountain Meadow | Los Angeles | FY/88 | 569,233 | 708,704 | 1,407,377 |
| Rec Park 18 | Long Beach | FY/83 | 126,249 | 201,087 | 690,532 |
| Rec Park 9 | Long Beach | FY/83 | 24,403 | 67,029 | 187,155 |
Of the six examples cited, five cities achieved revenue increases between 24 percent and 400 percent within the first year of private operation.
3. Best Practices/Case Studies
There are scores of examples of successful golf-course privatization and also a number of failures. More than 500 municipalities throughout the United States have successfully completed the privatization process. Much can be learned from their experiences.
| Case Study 1: Los Angeles County, CA - Increased Revenue |
|
The county started the contracting process as a way to increase revenue, and has been satisfied with the effort. An example of the county’s success is the Mountain Meadow Course. Before the course was privatized in fiscal 1989, it was generating revenues of approximately $570,000. After privatization, county revenues increased to $708,000. As of fiscal 1996, Mountain Meadow generated revenues of $1.4 million, more than doubling the profit of the pre-contract year. |
| Case Study 2: Detroit, MI - Capital Improvements |
|
According to Detroit’s former director of Recreation and Parks, Dan Krichbaum, "It's been a win-win situation." The new management "improved the condition of the course and increased the number of rounds played," making capital improvements the city could not afford. Krichbaum added that the competition has also improved operations at two courses the city continues to manage. A key reason Detroit leased out its courses was its inability to make needed capital improvements. The city reports that the condition of the courses has significantly improved since the private contractor took over. In addition, the public has reacted positively to the improved playing conditions and the more efficient operations. No municipal workers lost employment due to the changes; all were either hired by the private contractor or transferred to other positions within the city. |
| Case Study 3: New York City, NY - Rescue from Decrepitude |
|
The company overhauled the clubhouses, repaired the irrigation systems, brought in new golf carts, and revamped the pro shops and snack bars. AGC has overhauled cash handling and security procedures and instituted full financial accountability and reporting standards. As a result, AGC now sets the standard for other city concessionaires. Rounds played at the seven courses have increased by 50 percent—from 300,000 before AGC took over to more than 450,000 in 1997. Before AGC assumed responsibility for the seven courses the city was losing $1 million a year on operating the seven courses. In 1997, AGC paid the city of New York more than $1.7 million in rent for the seven courses. Privatization did generate some initial resistance from club members at these courses who were afraid they were going to lose their privileges. These problems have worked themselves out. Most of the employees were transferred to other departments or hired by the private contractor. New York City officials attribute the success of the privatization to a strong monitoring program. |
| Case Study 4: Chicago, IL - User Friendly Access |
|
As a result of the capital improvements and more efficient operations (such as computerized reservations), course reservations increased from about 4,000 before privatization to about 40,000 in its second year of operation Kemper runs Chicago’s courses under a 10-year lease agreement. The golf courses have improved dramatically. Prior to privatization there were asphalt tees at Marovitz, security problems at Columbus, and graffiti on the walls at South Shore. Yardage markers were infrequent and largely inaccurate. Conditions were haphazard at all locations and the telephone tee time system was unreliable. In 1993 and 1994, the Kemper management program provided more than $570,000 for capital improvements at the courses and driving ranges. These improvements have included replacing 36 asphalt tees with natural grass, building 15 new tees and 16 new sand bunkers, and putting up a canopy at the Diversey range so golfers can use it year-round. At several courses, golf carts are now available, the instruction programs have been expanded, and Kemper held Chicago’s first ever Women’s Amateur Tournament. |
| Case Study 5: San Francisco, CA - Environmental Innovation |
|
In partnership with the Center for Resource Management, a nonprofit group which helps develop working relationships between industry and environmental groups, Arnold Palmer Golf is using the Presidio as a demonstration project for implementing environmentally friendly programs that can be utilized by golf courses throughout the nation. Specific environmental innovations include a multi-phased water conservation and management program based on a state-of-the-art irrigation system; a weather monitoring system providing the exact amount of water required, and the use of reclaimed water when available; the incorporation of a least-impact turf maintenance program aimed at preserving the quality of the grounds; and implementation of a chemical-applications management plan to control chemical use and minimize pesticide use. Based on Arnold Palmer’s innovative environmental practices, the Presidio Golf Course was selected as one of nine winners of the 1996 Environmental Achievement Awards by the San Francisco Green Ribbon panel, a nonprofit group of environmental professionals from the business community and the public sector. Arnold Palmer’s management plan has been designed to provide maximum public access to the game. Programs include a project with the San Francisco police to bring golf to ‘at risk’ youths and partnerships with community-based groups—such as the Center of Independent Living and Whistlestop Wheels—to provide easier access for seniors and the disabled. Arnold Palmer Golf’s approach to managing the Presidio course is also customer-oriented. Amenities includes a free "Palmer Shuttle" to provide transit to the course and other points in the park, and, in time, there will even be a staff pro "walking the range" to offer swing advice at no charge. San Francisco’s entire parks and recreation program also benefits from privatization. Palmer Golf’s maintenance staff regularly shares state-of-the-art maintenance equipment with the city for use on softball fields and other open spaces and lends expertise in recreational services to the Gordon F. Moore Park. |
4. How-to-Tips
5. Contact Information
| Experts | Larry Hirsh Golf Property Analysts 4775 Linglestown Road Harrisburg, PA 17112 |
8. Links