Table of Contents
|
1. Trends 2. Cost Savings Potential 3. Best Practices/Case Studies 4. How-To Tips |
5. Contact Information 6. Research/Articles 7. Legislation 8. Links |
1. Trends
2. Cost Savings Potential
Cost savings from competitively contracting fire services range from 10 percent to 50 percent, with most communities falling in the middle of this range.
A study by John C. Hilke, a staff economist with the Federal Trade Commission, based on data in 48 cities, found that "the use of voluntary fire-fighting units reduce local-government expenditures for fire-fighting activities" and that these savings in the fire-fighting budget are not simply reallocated to other programs, but are reflected in lower spending and lower taxes in these cities.
3. Best Practices/Case Studies
| Case Study: Westminster, California — Intergovernmental Contracting |
|
Westminster’s former city fire fighters had bitterly protested the city’s decision to contract out the service. They attempted to recall the four (out of five) council members who favored the idea, but the recall effort failed. The council members argued that economics in fire protection were essential in order for Westminster to afford increased police protection—and the voters agreed. Both the winning Orange County bid and the second-place Rural/Metro bid proposed saving Westminster taxpayers some $11 million over the five-year contract term, with the county bid offering about $500,000 more in savings. |
| Case Study: Scottsdale, Arizona — Contracting |
|
Besides offering high quality, the company has figured out how to produce this labor-intensive service at lower cost. The key is to use a mix of full-time firefighters and on-call paid reservists (most of whom are city employees who receive regular monthly training and have permission to leave their city jobs when their pagers alert them to a structure-fire call). Using its innovative combination of full-time and part-time firefighters, Rural/Metro averages 23 firefighters on every Scottsdale fire call. A half-dozen outside studies over the years have verified the cost-effectiveness of Rural/Metro’s approach. Eighty-eight firefighters are employed full-time in Scottsdale; 70 others are employed part-time. All are trained at levels consistent with the standards set by both the Arizona State Fire Marshall’s Office and the National Fire Protection Association. The company agrees to provide a "minimum of 240 hours of training each year of service to all full-time firefighters ... and a minimum of 72 hours of training per year [or eight hours per month] for all reserves and Fire Support fire fighters." Moreover, all full-time firefighters must hold the "Firefighter II level of certification, State Emergency Medical Technician certification, and EMT-D certification when working in the primary service area." The agreement worked out between the City of Scottsdale and Rural/Metro Corporation is the most comprehensive and demanding fire privatization agreement that exists. It includes, for example, provisions specifying response time requirements, response-time definition, response-time liabilities, response-time penalties, and — because sometimes special circumstances arise — exception report logs. The thorough and precise nature of the agreement is intended to ensure that Scottsdale taxpayers get their money’s worth from Rural/Metro. The contract is valued at more than $5 million and a strict system of accountability is built into the agreement. There are nearly a dozen different monthly reports that "must be completed and submitted to the City’s Contract administrator within 15 days after the end of each month." Among the various reports required of Rural/Metro:
In addition to providing fire and emergency medical services, Rural/Metro also enforces the city fire code, and ensures that new construction is in compliance with city fire ordinances. Before the owner of a new building can be granted a Certificate of Occupancy by the city, the building must first be inspected thoroughly by Rural/Metro. All new fire protection systems, including hydrants, sprinkler systems, alarm systems, halon systems, etc., are examined and tested by the firm. University City Science Center, which conducted an in-depth, five-month study of the firm concluded that Rural/Metro’s "model prevention and inspection program provides citizens with a higher degree of safety than that which is available in most communities .... It has one of the lowest structure fire rates and fire dollar loss rates in the valley. At the same time the costs for services are low compared to other communities." |
4. How-to-Tips
5. Contact Information
| Practitioners | Ted Beam Rural/Metro Corporation P.O. Drawer F Scottsdale, AZ 85252 (602) 994-3886 |
Larry Holms Fire Authority Director P.O. Box 86 Orange County, CA 92666-0086 (714) 744-0400 |
|
| Experts | Geoffrey F. Segal Reason Public Policy Institute 3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90034 (310) 391-2245 |
Gary Jensen American Emergency Services Corporation P.O. Box 215 Wheaton, IL 60189 (847) 364-7163 |
|
Roy Miller Fire Privatization Consultants 1529 West Virginia Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85007 (602) 230-5276 |
6. Research/Articles
8. Links