Table of Contents
|
1. Trends 2. Cost Savings Potential 3. Best Practices/Case Studies 4. How-To Tips |
5. Contact Information 6. Research/Articles 7. Legislation 8. Links |
1. Trends
A 1994 study found that between 1982 and 1992, the use of private contracting for the operation and management of hospitals increased by 31 percent. Over the past two decades, hundreds of public hospitals have been sold to for-profit or non-profit providers.
A veritable revolution is occurring in the way in which health care is being provided to the indigent and uninsured. The advent of managed care and popularity of outpatient care is leading to a fundamental restructuring of the whole health care system. One offshoot of this is a declining need for hospital beds, especially in public hospitals.
In addition to dwindling public resources, the main force driving this change is vigorous competition from private and non-profit hospitals for treating the poor. In most communities, even those on public assistance now have a choice of providers. In 10 years it is unlikely that many local governments will find it strategically desirable to directly operate their own public hospitals and clinics because more cost-effective choices are becoming available.
The number of public hospitals has been shrinking for twenty years. There were 1,761 public hospitals at the state and local levels in 1975 and only 1,350 in 1995, a decline of 23 percent. In recent years, public hospitals have been more likely than either nonprofit or for-profit hospitals to convert their ownership status. The favored conversion is from public to nonprofit status. For instance, between 1990 and 1993, 88 percent of public-hospital conversions were to nonprofit status.
The current ownership structure of hospitals breaks down as follows:
Occupancy rates at all community hospitals, including public, nonprofit, and for-profit, are already below 60 percent (below 50 percent in California and will continue to shrink. The rapid decline in occupancy rates of the last ten years will accelerate over the next ten--communities that now have twice the hospital beds they need soon will have three times as many beds as can be efficiently supported.
2. Cost Savings Potential
Leasing or selling public hospitals typically results in substantial one-time revenues, as well as increased ongoing property and sales tax revenues. Austin, Texas, signed a 30-year lease with a private provider to operate its public hospital. The private firm is paying the city $2.3 million annually as part of the lease agreement.
Cost savings from contracting out the operation and management of hospitals typically ranges from 20 to 55 percent.
Outsourcing hospital services can achieve cost savings in the range of 15 percent to 40 percent. Nassau County Medical Center in New York saved $1 million in salaries and benefits from outsourcing its clinical services. The contract also resulted in $1 million in new revenues.
3. Best Practices/Case Studies
| Case Study: Orange County, California — Competitive Contracting |
|
The Healthcare Association of Southern California appoints a committee each year to negotiate with the County. All hospitals desiring to qualify for county payments sign a single "Master Medical Services Agreement." The physicians sign a similar Master Agreement. The single contract simplifies administration, and the County also reduces paperwork by contracting with a fiscal intermediary to process claims. The MSI program cuts costs because the county can protect itself through a fixed allocation of dollars to the Master Agreement. All the hospitals and physicians split the capped allocation at the end of the year (although the county makes provisional cash payments quarterly) in proportion to the units of service they actually delivered to indigents. Additionally, every hospital with a 24-hour emergency room must treat anyone who shows up in critical condition, or the hospital will lose its license. The MSI program includes 28 contracting hospitals; 28,758 inpatient days; 16,853 emergency room visits; 2,100 participating physicians; 187,587 visits; and 26,000 unduplicated clients. Orange County runs the entire program with a staff of seven employees. Orange County’s payment for each day of inpatient service for indigents in 1993-1994 was $816. This payment covers an average of all five acuity levels, including all nursing, administration, hotel, and ancillary services. The only item excluded is physician charges. This rate compares favorably with the $1,300 per day paid to county operated hospitals in Los Angeles. |
| Case Study: Amarillo, Texas — Asset Sale |
| When the Amarillo Hospital District sold its community hospital to Universal Health Services, the sale yielded the following benefits:
Board members interviewed by the Amarillo News Globe said the sale of the public hospital gave them the best of all worlds: lower taxes and better services. "Without Universal’s help, the Northwest Texas Healthcare System faced a difficult time due to increased competition. The results would have been an increase in taxes, cut in services to indigents, or both." |
| Case Study: Conroe, Texas — Asset Sale |
| Burdened by an ever-growing indigent population, Conroe, a 200,000-population community north of Houston, Texas, was faced with two choices:
The winning bidder to purchase the hospital was Healthtrust, Inc., the owner of the largest private hospital in the area (Healthtrust later was acquired by Columbia/HCA, the nation’s largest hospital company.) The final sale price was $104 million, $20 million more than the estimated fair market value. The community realized a net "profit" of $30 million after $58.6 million in bond debt was paid off. The "profit" was used to establish a non-profit Community Foundation to meet the ongoing health needs of the community. Healthtrust closed its own private hospital (instead of the public hospital), in order to solve the overbedding problem in the area and transferred its staff to the public hospital, which was renamed Columbia Conroe Regional Medical Center. Columbia/HCA has since added $35 million in improvements to the hospital. Through the privatization, the community is realizing increased revenue through new property and other tax payments by the hospital, which totaled $2 million in 1995. As a result, the tax rate has declined 42 percent. Indigents have fared best of all. The number of indigents served has gone up substantially — enrollees increased 11.7 percent from 1995 to 1996. Indigent outpatient services increased 36 percent. Columbia is paying $10 million for indigent care, despite receiving only $6 million in payments from the district. |
4. How-to-Tips
[See: Privatizing Public Hospitals: Strategic Options in and Era of Industry-Wide Consolidation, Reason Public Policy Institute, Policy Study #242, 1998.]
5. Contact Information
| Practitioners | Larry Kloess Columbia Conroe Regional Medical Center 504 Medical Center Road Conroe, TX 77304 (409) 539-7415 |
Alice Mastrini Orange County Health Care Agency Office of Policy and Planning 515 North Sycamore Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 834-5735 |
|
| Experts | Richard L. Tradewell Reason Public Policy Institute Adjunct Scholar 1709 Palau Place Costa Mesa, CA 92626-3621 (714) 434-0191 (714) 434-0496 (fax) |
Richard J. Steele Birch & Davis Associates 8905 Fairview Road Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301) 589-6760 |
6. Research/Articles